Sentinel Method · Verified by design

How we verify
every claim

Four phases. Licensed sources only. Named human sign-off. No anonymous AI output ships from ThriveFinity.

214
Verdicts delivered
Teardown + paid · Jan 2024–Apr 2026
36h
Median turnaround
Audit tier · n=147 verdicts
96%
Shipped after verdict
Paid tier · 60-day post-verdict survey

Phase 00 · Intake

Brief received. Scope defined

Every engagement begins with a structured intake. We read the brief, identify the claims to be verified, define the evidence scope, confirm the service tier, and return a written scope statement within 4 hours. Nothing retrieves until scope is agreed.

Scope statement returned within 4 hours of brief submission
Step 01
Receive brief

Founder submits the intake form with their brief, claims list, and context. We confirm receipt within 30 minutes.

Step 02
Define scope

We extract each verifiable claim, flag ambiguities, and return a written scope statement. You confirm or adjust before anything retrieves.

Step 03
Confirm tier

Teardown (1 claim), Audit (full asset), or Council (full Sentinel + named verifier). Scope gates retrieval — nothing proceeds without written confirmation.

Phase 01 · Retrieve

Sources first, claims second

Before a single claim is evaluated, the Sentinel retrieves relevant evidence from licensed corpora. No web scraping. No model training data. No unverified secondary sources.

Example · Retrieve in action
Claim submitted:
“Our market is growing at 22% CAGR”
Sentinel retrieved:
3 Gartner reports · 2 Statista datasets · 1 ONS release
Gartner Research
Statista Datasets
PitchBook
ONS / UK Gov
Academic databases
Industry associations

Phase 02 · Challenge

Every claim meets its harshest critic

The Sentinel generates three adversarial positions against each claim: the most likely investor objection, the most likely regulatory challenge, and the most likely factual alternative. The claim must survive all three.

Claim flagged → Rewritten as: 2.6× faster close time (n=22 cohort, Dec 2025, methodology on request)
Original claim
“Our platform is 3× faster than legacy solutions”
Investor objection
“3× faster by what metric? Close time? Processing speed? Load time?”
Regulatory challenge
“Is this benchmarked against a named competitor? Have they consented to the comparison?”
Factual alternative
“n=4 internal tests ≠ statistically significant — what is the sample size?”

Phase 03 · Cite

Every number has a home

Surviving claims receive an inline citation in ThriveFinity’s standardised format. The citation includes source name, publication date, methodology note, and a confidence level.

BEFORE
“UK mid-market compliance software: £1.4B in 2025”
Citation applied
CITATION
[Gartner UK Software Market Report · Jan 2026 · Based on vendor revenue surveys, n=340 · Confidence: High]
AFTER
“UK mid-market compliance software: £1.4B in 2025 (Gartner UK, Jan 2026)

Citation validity criteria — all five must pass

Licensed only
No scraped or unverified data sources accepted
Under 24 months
Sources must be current — no stale data accepted
Methodology disclosed
How data was gathered must be on record
Sample size stated
n= must be explicit and statistically defensible
Confidence assigned
High / Medium / Low rating on every citation

Phase 04 · Sign

A name on the record

A named human strategist — not AI, not a pseudonym — reads the complete draft, tests the reasoning, and signs. If they won’t sign it, it does not ship. Their name appears in the footer of every verdict.

PU
Pranav Unni
Strategy Verifier · ThriveFinity
Human-verified
Automatic refusal policy
  • 1Claims without a traceable, licensed source
  • 2Market size assertions derived from unaudited or proprietary models
  • 3Competitive comparisons naming companies without their verified consent to the benchmark
  • 4Regulatory compliance assertions without qualified legal review and sign-off

Live example

The Sentinel in action. From claim to cited verdict

Sentinel verdict · Pre-Launch Verification · Council tier
Before — unverified draft
“The UK compliance software market is one of the fastest-growing in Europe, expanding at over 25% annually, and our product is already preferred by compliance teams everywhere.”
Sentinel analysis · 3 phases applied
After — Sentinel-verified
Pranav Unni
Verified · ThriveFinity · Council verdict · 22 Apr 2026 · 3 citations · 0 unsupported claims

ACCOUNTABILITY

The guarantee that keeps us honest

If your verdict contains a single unsupported claim, refund in full within 30 days

No questions asked. We publish the refund count and corrections publicly every month. Every Council verdict carries the same promise.

Monthly refund log · Published publicly

Month Verdicts delivered Unsupported claims Refunds issued Corrections published
Apr 2026700
Mar 202611111(corrected & published)
Feb 2026900
Jan 2026800
Dec 2025600

AI transparency

What AI does — and what humans do

ThriveFinity uses AI as a research assistant, not as an oracle. Here is the exact boundary.

What AI does
  • Queries licensed corpora (Gartner, Statista, CB Insights, PubMed, regulatory filings)
  • Generates an initial structured draft from retrieved sources
  • Matches submitted claims against retrieved evidence
  • Drafts adversarial challenges for human review
  • Formats citations and produces confidence scores
What humans do
  • Read every claim and verify it against the cited source independently
  • Reject or rewrite any assertion that cannot be confirmed
  • Test the logical reasoning of the overall output
  • Sign with their name — and own the consequences if it is wrong
  • Apply the automatic refusal policy to exclude unacceptable claims
EU AI Act · Article 50

Transparent by statute. Honest by design

Every ThriveFinity verdict that contains AI-synthesised content carries a mandatory Article 50 disclosure. This is not an opt-in. It ships with every output, before the client reads it.

  • AI synthesis flagged at the top of every verdict document
  • Human sign-off name, date, and credential stated explicitly
  • Source retrieval method and model usage disclosed on request
  • No generated images, no deepfakes, no deceptive content — prohibited at intake
  • Data stored on EU infrastructure; deletion on request, immediate
50
EU AI Act · Transparency obligations

Providers of AI systems that interact with humans must ensure those humans are informed they are interacting with an AI. ThriveFinity embeds this disclosure in every AI-assisted verdict, with the human verifier’s signature as the accountability layer.

Read the full text