Paste one claim.
Get your free Teardown.
A Teardown is a single-claim verification. You paste one statement from your deck, brief, or investor update. A named human verifier checks it against licensed databases, flags what's wrong, and returns a cited rewrite — in 72 hours, at no cost.
One claim. Three deliverables
Every Teardown includes exactly these three things — nothing more is promised, nothing less is delivered.
What gets checked
Your claim is assessed against licensed industry databases, primary research sources, and public filings. We verify the underlying numbers, the market sizing methodology, and whether comparable companies make the same assertion.
- Statista, CB Insights, Bloomberg data
- Comparable company filings and press
- Methodology check (bottom-up vs. top-down)
- Investor pushback likelihood score
What gets returned
You receive one rebuttal with a citation trail, one suggested rewrite of the claim, and a confidence rating (High / Medium / Contested). The verdict is delivered to your email and signed by a named verifier.
- One rebuttal with citation trail
- One suggested rewrite of your claim
- Confidence rating: High / Medium / Contested
- Human signature + verifier name
What happens next
You decide what to do with it. If the claim holds up, you have a citation to use. If it doesn't, you have a better claim before it leaves the room. If you want the full deck verified, that's an Audit (£499).
- No obligation — one-and-done if you choose
- Upgrade to Audit to cover the full deck
- Use the citation trail in your own materials
- Follow up by email — one clarification included
This is what a Teardown looks like
The card on the right is a representative example — not a live output. It shows the structure of a typical Teardown: the original claim (struck through in red), the corrected version (in green), the citation that supports it, and the verifier's signature at the bottom.
Claims assessed typically involve market size, growth rates, competitive positioning, user metrics, and regulatory assertions.
Ready to find out if your claim holds up?
Paste the exact text from your deck, one-pager, or brief. Tell us the context. We'll do the rest and email you within 72 hours.
- No payment card — ever, at this stage
- No auto-enroll into a trial or subscription
- Named human verifier — you'll know who checked your claim
- One clarification round included — reply to the verdict email
- Covered by ThriveFinity's privacy policy — no data sold
What makes a good claim?
A specific assertion with a number or comparative: "Our TAM is £4.2bn", "Churn is 1.8%", "Faster than Competitor X by 40%". Vague statements like "we're disrupting the market" can't be verified — pick the claim an investor would challenge.
Submit Your Free Teardown
72-hour verdict · Named verifier · No card required
What's included across tiers
| Feature | Teardown (Free) | Audit (£499) | Council (£1,999) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claims covered | 1 | Full asset | Full asset |
| Delivery time | 72 hours | 48 hours | 48 hours |
| Citation trail | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Named human verifier | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (on cover page) |
| Suggested rewrites | 1 | All claims | All claims |
| Rebuttal rounds | 1 (email) | Up to 3 | Unlimited |
| Investor-readiness score | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitive intelligence | — | ✓ | ✓ (full brief) |
| Strategic brief | — | — | ✓ |
| Direct verifier contact | — | — | ✓ |
| Payment required | No | £499 | £1,999 |
Questions about the Teardown
What counts as a "claim" for the Teardown?
How is this different from asking an AI chatbot?
Who signs the Teardown verdict?
Can I submit more than one claim?
What happens if the claim is correct?
How exactly is the verdict delivered?
Is my claim and deck data kept confidential?
Why is it free — what's the catch?
What types of claims are out of scope?
Can I use the Teardown verdict in my investor materials?
How long does it take and what happens if it's late?
Free · 72h · Cited · Human-signed
Ready to find out what's wrong with your claim?
Paste it below. A named human verifier will tell you exactly what an investor will challenge — and give you a better version with citations to back it up.
Submit Your Free TeardownFounders who saw clearly before launch
ThriveFinity caught three claims in our launch deck that we had taken for granted for months. The Council verdict arrived in 48 hours — cited, rewritten, and signed. We shipped the revised deck and closed our first enterprise pilot within two weeks.
Read full case study — Daily99ThriveFinity pulled apart three of our core keyword assumptions inside 48 hours — every one cited to sources we hadn't checked. The rewritten brief landed us on page one for two terms within six weeks. That's the kind of honest push-back that changes outcomes.
Read full case study — PayRamWe were running paid campaigns on claims that sounded right but had never been validated. ThriveFinity tore through three of them in 48 hours — cited, rewritten, and honest about what we were overstating. The revised messaging drove a 40% lift in campaign conversion. Worth every penny and then some.
Read full case study — TVP StudiosStart free. Move up when the stakes do
No credit card to start. No commitment. Send us one claim and see what we find — most founders are surprised by what comes back.
- 1 public claim verified
- 1 rebuttal ranked
- 72-hour delivery
- Full asset reviewed
- 3 rebuttals, ranked
- 48-hour delivery
- 30-day refund guarantee
- Full Sentinel Method applied
- Named human verifier signs
- 3 ranked rebuttals + rewrite
- 30-day refund
All prices in GBP. VAT may apply. Full refund within 30 days if any verdict contains an uncited claim.
Council capacity: 4 slots per week · 2 remaining this weekGet Your Free Teardown
Start free — no card, no commitment. Upgrade at any point.
Blog
View All PostsWhy Your Series A Deck Will Fail the 40-Minute Test
VCs spend exactly 40 minutes desk-researching your deck before the meeting. Here's what they find — and how verified evidence changes the dynamic.
The Category Problem: Why Most Benchmarks Are Wrong
How category mismatches silently invalidate your strongest data points — and a framework for finding defensible benchmarks that match your product.
Rebuttal Architecture: Preparing for Investor Questions
The founders who close fastest aren't those with the best answers — they're the ones who raised the hard questions themselves, first.